Sunday, 4 October 2015

Family Law Myths - De Facto Relationships in Australia

As a Family attorney, I usually consult with those who are told the incorrect data concerning family law in Australia.

One of the foremost common myths is concerning actual relationships. Some misconceptions I've detected include:

"He/She cannot build a claim as a result of we have a tendency to did not marry"
"if he was along with her three months... he's entitled to half"

A few fast things to clarify concerning actual relationships in Australia:


  • there's no automatic 50/50 split in Australia for actual (or even married) couples
  • there's no three or half dozen month rule. there's a general a pair of year rule, however there ar plenty of exceptions to the present rule (ie if you have got youngsters and/or have combined finances) therefore you ought to not build assumptions supported time alone
  • simply because the assets are in one person's name doesn't mean the opposite party cannot build a claim
  • If you do not formalise a settlement, your ex might build a claim against you within the future


The first question you wish to raise is: ar we have a tendency to in a very actual relationship?

Some of the factors the Court can take into account in deciding if you're in a very actual relationship are:


  • was the link a pair of years or more? 
  • does one have children? 
  • does one live together? 
  • does one share finances? 
  • does one contribute to every alternative (both money and non money contributions) 
  • and far a lot of


Essentially, if you think that you would possibly be in a very actual relationship, then you wish to travel get some legal recommendation from Associate in Nursing professional family attorney.

Assuming the solution is affirmative, you're in a very actual relationship, ensuing question is, what settlement (if any) am I entitled to?

Just like for married couples, the Court applies a four stage approach. The law www.whiteberman.com.au on this in Australia is long and complex, however a brief outline of the steps are:

1) what's the plus pool? (this includes all assets, liabilities and superannuation);

2) What contributions have every party created to the assets & to the link (including money contributions, non money contributions, contributions as lady of the house and parent, etc)

3) What ar our current and future money circumstances attending to look like? (comparing things like variations in financial gain, resources, care of youngsters, capability to figure, age, health, etc)

4) when considering the three steps on top of, what would be a "just and equitable" settlement

No comments:

Post a Comment